Corrections log of the ranking and the knowledge base
Spotted an error? Report it via the editorial contact page. We check every report and record the outcome below, even if it undermines our own conclusion.
Corrections
: Scores from the predecessor not carried over
What it said: The predecessor site bestelocalseospecialist.nl showed scores (including 94 for the founder) without any underlying measurement or follow-up call report.
What it says now: No scores are shown until edition 1 has been measured. The founder is no longer in the ranking.
: Method replaced
What it said: Local SEO Authority Index: client satisfaction 40, proven case studies 25, follow-up client calls 20, knowledge sharing and awards 15.
What it says now: Local Search & AI Index: follow-up client calls 20, reviews 20, proven results 25, implementation and measurement honesty 15, AI visibility 10, transparency 10.
: Claim about Wikidata removed
What it said: The predecessor described the founder as the only Dutch local SEO specialist with a Wikidata identifier.
What it says now: That claim could not be verified and has been removed.
More on Beste GEO Bureau
- Best GEO agency in the Netherlands: independent ranking
- Best (local) GEO specialist: ranking of independents
- Best GEO agency lists checked: who ranks themselves 1st?
- The LSAI method: how we assess specialists
- Follow-up client calls: the human factor in the ranking
- Measuring AI visibility without positions: our method
- Choosing a GEO agency: 10 questions for the first call
- Tally sheet: measure your own AI visibility as a percentage
- Gijs Bodenstaff: local SEO and GEO specialist, tester and author